Perspectives on AI, governance, cybersecurity and digitalisation for boards and executive teams.
When AI writes the requirements catalogue, the answer and the evaluation, the human is left with the signature. What that means for the Board of Directors.
Language models recommend the same strategies across all providers. What that means for boards and executives, and which check costs nothing.
The Liechtenstein register hack reveals five patterns that recur across many IT environments, from uneven security to uncontrolled outsourcing.
IT providers recommend from their own portfolio, not from your actual requirement. Governance can manage that information asymmetry, but it cannot remove it.
Complexity grows quietly and charges three bills at once: security, controllability and cost. Cutting the self-inflicted share moves all three together.
A good quarterly report tells the board what was noticed, not what happened. Boards need pre-committed decisions, not just reporting.
Decades of selecting leaders for fit rather than friction narrowed the corridor of accepted profiles. Three more forces are narrowing it further.
A field test on open Wi-Fi shows where most cyber risk actually starts: with us, not with AI. What that means for the board.
Location and technical control are two separate questions. Answering only one gives the illusion of data sovereignty, not the real thing.
Why AI raises the likelihood of a cyberattack more than its damage, and why a certificate alone no longer protects a board.
